Policy paper: (Non)performance of the system for prevention of corruption in public procurements in Macedonia

One of key generators behind the lukewarm efforts to fight corruption and, in general, abuses/malpractices of any type in public procurements concerns lack of any control or oversight whatsoever over implementation of public procurements. No control mechanisms are in place about which entity, for which purpose and how much plans to procure, how that is procured and, finally, whether what has been procured is worth the money spent and guarantees complete and purposeful fulfilment of procurement needs.
05/02/201911
E-mail
Print
PDF

Policy paper: (Non)performance of the system for prevention of corruption in public procurements in Macedonia

Tender procedures, a term popularly used for public procurements, are yet another area prone to corruption, if not the area most susceptible to corruption. According to global estimates, corruption accounts for 10% to 30% of the total value of all procurements. A simple math exercise shows that if public procurements in Macedonia account for up to one billion euros on annual level, then corruption “devours” 100 to 300 million euros of taxpayers money in Macedonia every year. For these reasons, Macedonia – as many other countries – has established a multitude of system institutions and has assigned them a particular role in the fight against corruption in public procurements, at least according to regulations and laws in effect. As is the case in to many other areas, the system in place has grossly underperformed.